btamail.net.cn_0040 - 2003-01-24 health issue - mailto:batch1@btamail.net.cn?subject=Miraculous-Health-Help-Opt-Me-In-e-Follow-Up-Series-Too!
Stupid spam


Home | Articles | Spams | 419 scams | Spambots | Deny list | Phone list | eMail list | FAQ | Forum
Remove requests | Decode 64 | Decode qp | Decode ip | Other sites | Spam SUCKS! | Formmail Scans
Logos | Phishing | Lottery Scams | Support TOASTEDspam.com | Network Testing Services | PushPinMap
(2364) View this spam as a pruned html file TOASTEDspam.com toasted spam dot com
btamail.net.cn_0040 - 2003-01-24 health issue - mailto:batch1@btamail.net.cn?subject=Miraculous-Health-Help-Opt-Me-In-e-Follow-Up-Series-Too!
Return-Path: <bqm_HealthConcerned856864@yahoo.com>
Received: from 218.77.38.137 (200-153-218-41.terra.com.br [200.153.218.41] (may be forged))
        by mail.munged.ext (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h0OA8Xa10958
        for <chien@munged.ext>; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 10:08:36 GMT
Message-Id: <200301241008.h0OA8Xa10958@mail.munged.ext>
From: cyj_MiraculousHealthVillage <bqm_HealthConcerned856864@yahoo.com>
To: chien@munged.ext
Cc: 
Subject: health issue?  you have?     adv                kon
Sender: cyj_MiraculousHealthVillage <bqm_HealthConcerned856864@yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 07:04:34 -0800
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html><head><title>Miraculous Health Letter</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
</head><body>

Dear chien@munged.ext,
<BR><BR>
We have MANY attestations on file at this Co. for miracles, everything from cancer recovery, 
to pneumonia to....you name it!  What's your "health issue"?  In a nutshell, exceptional nutrients is 
GOOD, but modern-times' nature and manufactured foods have been recently discovered as 
missing a basic needed group of saccharides ("sugars", but the group that is not sweet or is 
the "bad sugar" kind) which are VITAL in the body for putting the cells back into basically good 
communication IN ORDER FOR THE NUTRIENTS TO KNOW WHERE TO GO! 
<BR>
Resolved, "voila!":  "Miracles" do occur!  
<BR>I myself personally have had a lower back pain helped-out completely.  Never 
thought this would help it as usual "pinched-off disk" explanation was ASSUMED.  Surprise, 
it was an inflammation at lower spine joint that was assisted into repair with this "miracle".
<BR>
Send me your snail-address WITH tele-no.and I send you info of website & free tape in the mail by 
<A HREF="mailto:batch1@btamail.net.cn?subject=Miraculous-Health-Help-Opt-Me-In-e-Follow-Up-Series-Too!">Clicking Here.</A>
<BR>"It" can most likely help. God-Speed! :-)  .................    <BR>jb
<BR><BR>

<A HREF="mailto:batch1@btamail.net.cn?subject=REMOVE-L10-list">REMOVES Click-Here</A>

-------------
<TABLE><TR><TD WIDTH="150" HEIGHT="350"><IMG SRC="http://www.newcreations.net/3d/images/crosses/cross6.gif"></TD>
<TD>Re: Cross image to the left: see public service announcement after the wrangling about
uce & spam at very bottom,  :-)
<BR>This message is in full compliance with U.S. Federal requirements for 
commercial email under bill S.1618 Title lll, Section 301, Paragraph 
(a)(2)(C) passed by the 105th U.S. Congress and proposed H.R. 3113 Unsolicited Commercial 
Electronic Mail Act of 2000 
(Refer to: http://www.spamlaws.com/federal/summ107.html) and thus cannot be considered SPAM 
since it includes a remove mechanism. Further transmissions by the sender may be stopped at no cost 
to you by clicking above.
</TD></TR></TABLE><TABLE><TR><TD>
<LARGE><B>ONLY SCAMS ARE SPAMS........  ('cuse the wee bit of poetry, but it be Sooth, :-)
</B></LARGE><BR>
UCE vs "Spam" Info:  Basically uce is the correct legal form, as opposed to "blatant" spam,
because it has contact means and mailer DOES actual removes, AND "ADV" for 
"advertisement" is in the subject-line.  People have a tendency to
do the A=A=A association by ACCIDENT of "all emails from unknowns is spam", but this is, as
I say, a reactive association and incorrect.  If you don't believe it, become a member of 
latimes.com, then enter "spam 9/28/02" in Search engine there and read the WHOLE article, 
and you'll see how the courts see it.  World needs to grow-up and see uce is nothing more 
legal and issue-wise than  "junk mail" in your home Mail-Box!  :-)  It's ONLY because of reactive
response and Internet being in early Wild-West days that wild conclusions had been incorrectly 
arrived at! Thank you VERY much!  God-Bless America!  Now let's go after REAL targets, like 
terrorists!
<BR><BR><B>Public Service announcement:  <i>Personal problems you'd like resolved? listen in to 
this advice Sunday morning show "The Jesus Christ Show" on www.kfi640.com, 6am to 8am Pacific 
Time-USA via the web, it's unlike any advice show you've ever heard!  Thank you, over 'n out! :-,)
</i></B></TD></TR></TABLE>
<BR>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR><BR><BR>
<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>
</body></html>

mchnvacppnsmcrsncjjldr

TOASTEDspam.com toasted spam dot com